Appendix: Annual Performance Report

Compact Amounts at Signing*

Compact Amounts at Signing
Partner Country	Compact Amount (in millions)	Signed	Entry Into Force	Closed
Madagascar	$109.8	4/18/2005	7/27/2005	8/31/2009
Honduras	$215.0	6/14/2005	9/30/2005	9/30/2010
Cabo Verde	$110.1	7/5/2005	10/18/2005	10/17/2010
Nicaragua	$175.0	7/15/2005	5/26/2006	5/26/2011
Georgia	$395.3	9/12/2005	4/7/2006	4/7/2011
Benin	$307.3	2/22/2006	10/6/2006	10/6/2011
Vanuatu	$65.7	3/2/2006	4/28/2006	4/28/2011
Armenia	$235.7	3/27/2006	9/29/2006	9/29/2011
Ghana	$547.0	8/1/2006	2/16/2007	2/16/2012
Mali	$460.8	11/13/2006	9/18/2007	8/24/2012
El Salvador	$460.9	11/29/2006	9/20/2007	9/20/2012
Mozambique	$506.9	7/13/2007	9/22/2008	9/22/2013
Lesotho	$362.6	7/23/2007	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Morocco	$697.5	8/31/2007	9/15/2008	9/15/2013
Mongolia	$284.9	10/22/2007	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Tanzania	$698.1	2/17/2008	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Burkina Faso	$480.9	7/14/2008	7/31/2009	7/31/2014
Namibia	$304.5	7/28/2008	9/16/2009	9/16/2014
Senegal	$540.0	9/16/2009	9/23/2010	9/23/2015
Moldova	$262.0	1/22/2010	9/1/2010	9/1/2015
Philippines	$433.9	9/23/2010	05/25/11	5/25/2016
Jordan	$275.1	10/25/2010	12/13/11	12/13/2016
Cabo Verde II	$66.2	2/10/2012	11/30/2012	11/30/2017
Indonesia	$600.0	11/19/2011	4/2/2013	4/2/2018
Malawi	$350.7	4/7/2011	9/20/2013
Zambia	$354.8	5/10/2012	11/15/2013
Georgia II	$140.0	7/26/2013	7/1/2014
Ghana II	$498.2	8/5/2014	9/6/2016
El Salvador II	$277.0	9/30/2014	9/9/2015
Benin II	$375.0	9/9/2015	6/22/2017
Liberia	$256.7	10/2/2015	1/20/2016
Morocco II	$450.0	11/30/2015	6/30/2017
Niger	$437.0	7/29/2016	01/26/18
Nepal	$500.0	9/14/2017
Côte d'Ivoire	$524.7	11/07/17
Mongolia	$350.0	7/27/2018
Senegal II	$550.0	12/10/2018

* Please note that the values above are the signed compact amounts and do not reflect lower actual expenditures due to early terminations or funds for a compact not being fully spent. The table on the following pages reflect the net obligations/commitments associated with each compact.

Compact Commitments, Obligations, and Plan

As of First Quarter FY 2019

Compact Commitments, Obligations, and Plan as of First Quarter FY 2019

Compact Commitments and Obligations
Country/Description	Fiscal Year of appropriation									Total
Country/Description	2012 & Prior	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	Total
Closed Compacts	$7,995	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$7,995
El Salvador II	$117	$160	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$277
Georgia II	$140	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$140
Ghana II	$17	$283	$198	-	-	-	-	-	-	$498
Liberia	-	-	-	$257	-	-	-	-	-	$257
Malawi	$351	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$351
Zambia	$355	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$355
Benin II	-	$207	-	$168	-	-	-	-	-	$375
Morocco II	$114	$1	$169	$166	-	-	-	-	-	$450
Niger	$58	-	-	-	$379	-	-	-	-	$437
Nepal	$108	$10	-	$69	$107	$129	$77	-	-	$500
Côte d'Ivoire	$41	$9	$272	$10	$26	$167	-	-	-	$525
Mongolia II	$100	-	-	$1	-	$95	$154	-	-	$350
Senegal II	$21	-	$1	-	-	-	$447	$81	-	$550
Committed & Obligated	$1,421	$670	$640	$671	$512	$391	$678	$81	-	$5,064

Planned Compacts
Country/Description	Planned Fiscal Year of appropriation or budget request
Country/Description	2012 & Prior	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	Total
Burkina Faso	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$304	$44	$348
Sri Lanka	$112		$44	$11	$105	$188	$20	-	-	$480
Tunisia	$63	-	-	-	$76	$51	$2	$158	-	$350
Lesotho II	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$89	$162	$250
Timor-Leste	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$250	$250
Kosovo	$8	-	-	$1	$7	$4	-	-	$74	$94
Indonesia II	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Malawi II	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Potential Regional Compacts	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Planned	$184	-	$44	$12	$187	$243	$22	$550	$529	$1,772

TOTAL

$9,600

$670

$684

$683

$699

$634

$700

$632

$529

$14,831

Closed Compacts

As of First Quarter FY 2019

Closed Compacts
Country/Description	Fiscal Year of appropriation									Total
Country/Description	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	Total
Armenia	-	$177	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$177
Benin	0	$302	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$302
Burkina Faso	-	-	-	-	$475	-	-	-	-	$475
Cabo Verde I	$109	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$109
Cabo Verde II	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$66	$66
El Salvador	-	-	$362	$88	-	-	-	-	-	$450
Georgia	$290	$24	-	$17	$56	-	-	-	-	$387
Honduras	$204	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$204
Indonesia	-	$50	-	-	-	-	-	$477	-	$526
Jordan	-	-	-	-	-	$55	$218	-	-	$273
Lesotho	-	-	-	$358	-	-	-	-	-	$358
Madagascar	$86	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$86
Mali	-	-	$434	-	-	-	-	-	-	$434
Moldova	$90	$16	$8	$1	$9	$86	$49	-	-	$259
Mongolia	-	-	-	$269	-	-	-	-	-	$269
Morocco	-	$72	$578	-	-	-	-	-	-	$650
Mozambique	-	-	-	$448	-	-	-	-	-	$448
Namibia	-	-	-	$219	$76	-	-	-	-	$296
Nicaragua	$113	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$113
Philippines	-	-	-	-	-	-	$385	-	-	$385
Senegal	-	-	-	-	-	$433	-	-	-	$433
Tanzania	-	-	-	-	$695	-	-	-	-	$695
Vanuatu	-	$65	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$65
Closed Compacts	$891	$1,243	$1,383	$1,400	$1,310	$574	$652	$477	$66	$7,995

Threshold Program Amounts at Signing*

Threshold Program Amounts at Signing
Country	Threshold Program Amount (in millions)	Signed	Closed
Burkina Faso	$12.9	7/22/2005	9/30/2008
Malawi	$20.9	9/29/2005	9/30/2008
Albania	$13.9	4/3/2006	11/15/2008
Tanzania	$11.2	5/3/2006	12/30/2008
Paraguay	$34.6	5/8/2006	8/31/2009
Zambia	$22.7	5/22/2006	2/28/2009
Philippines	$20.7	7/26/2006	5/29/2009
Jordan	$25.0	10/17/2006	8/29/2009
Indonesia	$55.0	11/17/2006	12/31/2010
Ukraine	$45.0	12/4/2006	12/31/2009
Moldova	$24.7	12/15/2006	2/28/2010
Kenya	$12.7	3/23/2007	12/31/2010
Uganda	$10.4	3/29/2007	12/31/2009
Guyana	$6.7	8/23/2007	2/23/2010
São Tomé & Principe	$8.7	11/9/2007	4/15/2011
Kyrgyz Republic	$16.0	3/14/2008	6/30/2010
Niger	$23.1	3/17/2008	12/31/2015
Peru	$35.6	6/9/2008	9/30/2012
Rwanda	$24.7	9/24/2008	12/31/2011
Albania	$15.7	9/29/2008	7/31/2011
Paraguay	$30.3	4/13/2009	7/31/2012
Liberia	$15.1	7/6/2010	12/15/2013
Timor-Leste	$10.5	9/22/2010	3/31/2014
Honduras	$15.7	8/28/2013
Guatemala	$28.0	4/8/2015
Sierra Leone	$44.4	11/17/2015
Kosovo	$49.0	9/12/2017
Togo	$35.0	2/14/2019

* Please note that the values above are the amounts of threshold program agreements at signing and do not reflect lower actual expenditures due to early terminations or funds for a threshold program not being fully spent.

Results of Recently-Closed Compacts

Indonesia

Indonesia
Overview	MCC's Compact Indonesia successfully closed on April 2, 2018. The Compact cumulatively disbursed approximately $474 million (79% of $600 million Compact total) and achieved a number of important successes. Notably, the Community-Based Health and Nutrition Project changed the national conversation around stunting and elevated anti-stunting efforts to a national priority. The Procurement Modernization Project achieved or exceeded many output level targets, ultimately trained over 1,000 individuals on the appropriate skills, systems, processes, and operating standards to reduce costs and achieve efficiency and greater transparency in procurement. Among the trained professionals, 24% are women who continue to build their career in this profession. The Green Prosperity Project achieved 73% of its revised multi-year financial plan and leveraged roughly $38 million in private sector and other outside financing. MCC and the Government of Indonesia are continuing to work together on post-compact reporting and sustainability measures.
Policy Reforms	The Indonesia compact achieved sector policy reforms through its Procurement Modernization and Green Prosperity projects. The Government of Indonesia (GOI) established procurement as a functional position within the government and successfully realized reforms to national regulations governing the procurement of public-private partnerships. At the sub-national level, several local governments passed regulatory reforms and institutionalized the practice of public procurement through local parliament legislation. Adoption of improved spatial planning guidelines as national regulations, thereby improving transparency in land governance administration and management of natural resources at the village, district, and provincial levels
Outputs	Green Prosperity Project 253,559 Hectares of peatland mapped 432,971 Estimated hectares improved, rehabilitated, or protected through sustainable practices 232 canal blocking structures built 12.73 Mw of generation capacity added 169 Kilometers of distribution lines upgraded or built 127,487 Farmers trained Community-Based-Health and Nutrition Project 17,276 Generasi Activity proposals approved 218 open-defecation-free villages in MCA-Indonesia working areas 1,182 sanitary toilets constructed by Private Sector Response Activity grant partners 35,626,390 iron folic acid tablets delivered to districts 0 Taburia (micronutrient) packets delivered to district 4,225 sanitation triggering events held at sub-village level 1,564 service providers trained on growth monitoring 17,531 service providers trained on Infant and Young Child Feeding 6,724 f service providers trained on community-led total sanitation triggering 1,207 service providers trained on supportive supervision Procurement Modernization Project 43 pilot procurement support units permanently established 66 framework agreements signed 675 PSU staff trained on procurement skills (Basic) 589 PSU staff trained on procurement skills (Intermediate) 494 PSU staff trained procurement skills (Advanced) 494 Management information system (PMIS) launched on March 15 2018 4 Public Private Partnership standard bidding documents produced
Preliminary and Expected Outcomes	Green Prosperity Project The Participatory Land Use Planning Activity expects to improve local capacity for administrative boundary setting, updating and integration of land use inventories, and enhancing spatial plans at the district and provincial levels. Technical Assistance and Oversight Activity expect to improved quality and design of renewable energy and natural resources management projects. Green Prosperity Facility Activity expects to increase investment in renewable energy and natural resources management, increased productivity, and reduced GHG emissions. The Green Knowledge Activity expects to improve local, provincial, and national capacity to drive forward Indonesia’s national low carbon development strategy within the context of the GP Project. Community-Based-Health and Nutrition Project The Community Projects Activity expects to improve health and education outcomes, including nutrition. The Supply-side activity expects to improve the ability of health service providers to prevent, diagnose, and treat stunting; improved nutrition of pregnant women and infants; improved sanitation behavior; and reduced incidence of diarrhea. The Communications activity plans to increase awareness about stunting. Procurement Modernization Project The Procurement Professionalization activity expects to improve procurement capacity and function of procurement service units and related spending units. The Policy and procedure activity expects to increase the rate and success of PPPs and improved environmental sustainability of government procurements
Evaluations	Procurement Modernization Project The impact evaluation/pre-post mixed methods design will answer whether there were changes to the shared culture and values; structure, leadership, and management; systems, including policies, procedures, and processes; skills and knowledge; and staffing of the PSUs as a result of the project. Community-Based-Health and Nutrition Project The impact evaluation will measure the project’s impact on child and maternal health outcomes (including stunting), behavioral practices related to nutrition and sanitation, and receipt of health services. The key findings of the interim evaluation of the Nutrition Project include: The share of respondents who had received training was significantly higher in project areas, but there were high levels of similar trainings in comparison areas. Child nutrition training was implemented as intended and was of high quality. Finally, sanitation training was implemented, though not as comprehensively as intended. As it relates to short-term outcomes, there were modest improvements in health provider knowledge, but not uniformly. Impacts varied by question and provider. No impacts were found on the frequency of nutritional group counseling sessions, which were of mediocre quality, nor on the fraction of beneficiaries receiving one-on-one health services. Village-level meetings to initiate behavior change around sanitation occurred more frequently in project areas, but these meetings omitted key steps conveyed in the training. Villages received grants as intended and most funding went toward health-related activities. Green Prosperity Project Green Prosperity: Participatory Land Use Planning (PLUP) This performance evaluation measure the program’s effect on spatial certainty, land disputes, transparency in land governance administration, and management of natural resources. Interim evaluation findings indicated the following: Stakeholders from the village- to the national-levels considered the PLUP activities to be relevant and important. There is evidence of improvements across expected short-term outcomes, including improved spatial certainty among villagers, resolution of land conflicts and disputes, and more strategic thinking about land use planning at the district level. The evaluation identified four key areas of risk related to the achievement and sustainability of PLUP results: 1) program design and approach, 2) design and management of implementation contracts, 3) coordination of closeout and sustainability, and 4) engagement at the national level. Green Prosperity: Grant Facility This performance evolution and quality of the design and implementation of the GPF. The evaluation focused solely on the implementation phase and did not assess the results of the grants funded by the GPF; some grant results are assessed by other evaluations. The key findings of this evaluation include: The GPF was not well-defined upfront and design continued, largely reactively, well into the compact implementation period.This delayed and shortened grant implementation. However, the GPF was an innovative model that addressed GOI priorities and provided access to international donor finance by non-traditional groups. With three months of implementation remaining, the GPF had disbursed 45 percent of the funding amounts estimated in 2014. Eighty-five percent of awarded grants continued to completion. The limited implementation timeframe and high operational costs diminished the GPF’s potential cost-effectiveness. Grantees perceived the GPF’s requirements and standards, particularly environmental, to be largely beneficial for their capacity to take on future grant funding. The GPF is linked to positive changes in the policy and enabling environment nationally and locally. The high administrative burden and changing guidance from MCC and GPF managers led to significant delays for grant implementation. Green Prosperity: Community-Based Off-Grid Renewable Energy Grant Portfolio This impact evaluation will assess the impacts of the new provision of grid electricity to households and businesses in remote areas. Green Prosperity: Cocoa Grant Portfolio A performance evaluation designed to assess the efficacy of training approaches, the validity of the theory of change, sustainability, and lessons learned. Cocoa Interim Evaluation key findings include: Most of the farmers in all three grants learned from the training and changed their farming practices in the short term. Farmers require ongoing mentoring and more time to see the results of their improved practices. GPF grantees Green Prosperity-Sustainable Cocoa Production Program and Cocoa Revolution progressed well against their training targets and achieved short term behavior changes, but there were obstacles to creating sustainable input markets and extension services. Another grantee, Economic, Quality and Sustainability Improvement, experienced delays in implementation. The sustainability of improved farmer practices is not assured. Prior to being funded by MCC, Green Prosperity-Sustainable Cocoa Production Program operated in 13 districts. It has expanded to 50 districts and will continue to operate post-compact. However, Cocoa Revolution and Economic, Quality and Sustainability Improvement will not continue their initiatives post-compact. Weather extremes and market conditions had significant negative effects on project results. Implementers must develop mitigation measures to increase the likelihood of achieving higher yields. Green Prosperity: Peatland Grant Portfolio This performance evaluation will assess the effectiveness and sustainability of the GPF’s grants regarding peatland rewetting. Green Prosperity: Social Forestry Grant Portfolio This performance evaluation will consist of an Evaluability Assessment to investigate whether grants categorized as social forestry were truly designed around and applied a common theory of change related to agro-forestry and the sustainable management of forest lands. Green Prosperity: On Grid Renewable Energy Grant Portfolio This performance evaluation will assess the sustainability of the GPF’s on-grid infrastructure grants in terms of continued power sales to the national utility and benefit sharing with communities surrounding the generation sites. Specifically, the four evaluation questions concern: The effect on energy consumption patterns of households and businesses. Whether the electricity provided by the renewable energy infrastructure has been used for economic purposes at the community and household level. Whether any changes in household expenditure will lead to reduced GHG emissions. Whether the Special Purpose Vehicle has been an effective intervention to improve community buy-in and sustainability of the infrastructure.

Malawi

Malawi
Overview	The Malawi Power Compact successfully closed on September 20, 2018. In 2013, MCC partnered with Malawi—a land-locked nation in southeastern Africa, one of the world’s poorest—to implement a US $350.7 million compact focused on the power sector, designed to reduce poverty through economic growth. The compact took a comprehensive approach to strengthening the nation’s power sector, providing funding for infrastructure, policy reform and environmental management. The compact modernized the power grid, transmission backbone, and hydropower generation to move power reliably throughout the country, and supported reforms to create a more sustainable power sector that can attract private investment in power generation. Compact funding for the construction of substations and the upgraded grid will allow Malawi to connect to the South Africa Power Pool so it can trade electric power with its neighbors. Several U.S. companies, including General Electric, Cardno, Maryland-based Ellicott Dredges, and Wisconsin-based Aquarius all delivered elements of the compact.
Policy Reforms	Modernized and created an enabling environment for future expansion of Malawi’s power sector by strengthening institutions and enhancing regulation and governance of the sector. Transformed the Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi (ESCOM) into a better managed utility with new tools to improve revenues and customer service. Amended Malawi’s Electricity Act to unbundle the state-owned utility (ESCOM) and create an Independent Power Producer framework that improved the power market structure and can attract more private investment in power generation. Improved regulatory oversight capacity of the Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority (MERA). Introduced a Social and Gender Inclusion & Anti-Sexual Harassment Policy at the power utility (ESCOM).
Outputs	Infrastructure Development Project Added 12 Megawatts of generation capacity at the Nkula A Hydropower Plant 3.4 kilometers of new distribution 11 kV cables were added Under the Transmission Network Upgrade Activity, the Compact upgraded or built 367 kilometers of transmission lines 809 MW of transmission substation capacity were added Power Sector Reform Project Billing system was installed in January 2018 Power Market Restructure Report was produced in December 2014 Electricity Act amended in December 2016 Independent Power Producer Framework approved in March 2017 866 ESCOM and EGENCO employees participated in gender trainings Environmental and Natural Resource Management Project 7,751 community leaders were trained on natural resource management issues 4,222 women enrolled in and completed leadership training 27,096 community members participated in operational Village Savings and Loans (VSLs) Supported the purchase and use of large-scale equipment, including a dredge, weed-harvesting equipment, conveyers, and disposal trucks
Preliminary and Expected Outcomes	The compact is estimated to generate US $232 million worth of net benefits over 20 years and benefit almost one million Malawians. Improve the availability, reliability and quality of the power supply by increasing the throughput capacity and stability of the national electricity grid. Create an enabling environment for future expansion by strengthening sector institutions and enhancing regulation and governance of the sector. Increase efficiency of hydropower generation.
Evaluations	Infrastructure Development Project & Power Sector Reform Project MCC has commissioned a rigorous, independent, performance evaluation of the Power Sector Reform Project. Midline data collection took place in November 2016 and was compared with data collected by the evaluation team in February and March 2015. Interim findings focused on the consultancies and their effectiveness, and highlighted lessons for policy and institutional reform projects, many of which are implemented through short term consultancies. The evaluation found that coordinating these consultancies and getting buy-in from the utility proved very difficult, while the short-term nature of the technical assistance limited MCC and MCA-Malawi’s ability to adapt to new information and address emerging issues. At midline, the evaluation found initial positive impacts of the project on ESCOM’s finances and creation of an enabling environment, while gains in ESCOM’s operations and governance have been limited, suggesting that long-run outcomes of the project are in question. The final evaluation for the Power Sector Reform Project will be produced in conjunction with the Infrastructure Development Project evaluation. At the household level, the evaluations will focus on household and individuals impacts, specifically, income; expenditures, consumption and access to energy; and individual time devoted to leisure and productive activities. At the enterprise level, the evaluation will focus on the activities’ potential impact of the program/project/activities on business profitability and productivity; value added production and investment; employment and wage changes; energy consumption and sources of energy used; and business losses. At the regulatory, institutional and policy level, the evaluation will explore the potential impacts on utility operating costs and losses; financial sustainability; private investment, particularly in generation; and expansion of electricity access for customers, particularly the poor. Environmental and Natural Resource Management Project MCC has commissioned a rigorous, independent performance evaluation of the ENRM Project to determine how the overall project and individual activities help to improve the efficiency of hydropower generation and reduce costly generation disruptions. The ENRM Project evaluation will address research questions on project outcomes, implementation, and sustainability, and will include a remote sensing analysis to examine land use changes over time in the Shire River Basin. The evaluator will also model how changes in land use management affect sedimentation rates in the Shire. The performance evaluations of the ENRM and SGEF grant facility and the Shire BEST Trust will examine activity implementation, achievement of results, and longer term sustainability. The performance evaluation of the ENRM and SGEF grants will include in-depth qualitative case studies with five grantees to examine activity implementation, changes in sustainable land management practices, changes in gender roles and household decision-making, and sustainability of results. Lastly, based on the results of each activity, the evaluation will seek to identify which implementation factors supported or hindered the effectiveness of the ENRM Project overall.

Zambia

Zambia
Overview	The Zambia Compact successfully closed on November 15, 2018. The Compact aimed to deliver expanded and rehabilitated water, sanitation and drainage infrastructure to 1.2 million people in the capital of Lusaka, including the establishment of a new solid waste management company to keep the new drains free of trash and debris. The compact’s reform activities are designed to improve service delivery provided by the Lusaka water utility and the Lusaka municipal government. New asset management, social and gender and peri-urban policies have been developed and are now in place. Seven infrastructure projects were largely completed and two will finish in 2019 with Government of Zambia funds. Vice President and General Counsel Jeanne Hauch visited Zambia in early November to showcase the compact’s achievements and meet with President Lungu.
Policy Reforms	The Zambia compact achieved many water and sanitation sector policy reforms. Passed new legislation establishing an autonomous entity to improve waste collection and recycling in the city of Lusaka to improve drainage and environmental health. Established Social and Gender policies and related training at the Lusaka City Council (LCC) and Lusaka Water and Sewerage Company (LWSC). Revised the Peri-Urban Policy at LWSC that set out utility priorities for extending and maintaining services in peri-urban areas. Established new pro-poor approaches to bill payment and debtor management at LWSC. Established environmental and health and safety requirements, including an improved regime for the disposal of sludge and asbestos according to international standards.
Outputs	Water, Sanitation and Drainage Infrastructure Activity 11,437 meters installed/replaced 81.6 Km of pipes replaced 26 Km of new pipes installed 333 Km water distribution network constructed 799 water connections 23.6Km drains constructed / rehabilitated Institutional Strengthening Activity 316 people trained in hygiene and sanitary best practices 12,319 households reached with messages on hygiene and sanitary best practices 91,682 Beneficiary Individuals from the Innovation Grant Program for Pro-Poor Service Delivery
Preliminary and Expected Outcomes	Water, Sanitation and Drainage Infrastructure Activity Expects to decrease the incidence and prevalence of water-related disease through increased access to clean water and decreased incidence of flooding Institutional Strengthening Activity Expects to improve the financial sustainability, operations and maintenance, environmental management and social inclusion of LWSC (Lusaka Water Supply and Sewage Company), LCC (Lusaka City Council) and support Compact outcomes through the Innovation Grant Program.
Evaluations	Water, Sanitation and Drainage Infrastructure ActivityThis randomized impact evaluation is designed to measure impacts on water-related diseases and time savings for households and businesses, including the beneficiary populations in the peri-urban neighborhoods of Lusaka where water and sanitation networks have been extended for the first time. Institutional Strengthening Activity An independent performance evaluation will assess the performance of the LWSSD project in contributing to the water, sanitation, and drainage sector sustainability through its effect on institutions (LWSC and LCC). This evaluation is expected to be completed by 2022. Innovation Grant Sub Activity This sub-activity is being evaluated separately to examine the overall performance of the IGP in relation to key programmatic and compact objectives, potential gaps or inefficiencies in IGP implementation, areas in which implementation can be improved, and positive aspects of the IGP that could potentially be expanded or replicated in other contexts.

Estimating Compact Beneficiaries and Benefits

Under MCC‘s results framework, beneficiaries are defined as an individual and all members of his or her household who will experience an income gain as a result of MCC interventions. We consider that the entire household will benefit from the income gain and counts are multiplied by the average household size in the area or country. The beneficiary standard makes a distinction between individuals participating in a project and individuals expected to increase their income as a result of the project. Before signing a compact, MCC estimates the expected long-term income gains through a rigorous benefit-cost analysis. MCC may reassess and modify its beneficiary estimates and the present value of benefits when project designs change during implementation.

Projected Beneficiaries and Income Benefits by Compact[[The table includes estimates for projects which have economic rates of return (ERRs) estimates from which income benefit calculations can be drawn in compacts that have entered into force and]][[These estimates do not include the projected beneficiaries of projects or activities that have been terminated or suspended by MCC (Madagascar, Honduras, Nicaragua and Armenia). In the case of Madagascar, the estimates account for the compact's early termination.]]
Compact	Estimated Number of Beneficiaries	Estimated Long Term Income Gain Over the Life of the Project (PV of Benefits)[[The Present Value (PV) of Benefits is the sum of all projected benefits accruing over the life of the project, typically 20 years, evaluated at a 10 percent discount rate. Estimates are reported in millions of U.S. dollars in the year that the ERR analysis was completed. Because the PV of benefits uses a discount rate, these figures cannot be compared directly to the undiscounted financial costs of MCC compacts, but must be compared to the PV of costs instead.]]	Estimated Net Benefits over the Life of the Project (Present Value)[[The Net Benefits column is new this year and will replace the Total Benefits column next year and thereafter. To accommodate the change, both the total and net benefit numbers are calculated from ERRs currently posted on the MCC website, meaning many of the numbers will be different from last year.]]
Armenia	428,000	$303,200,000	$150,400,000
Benin	14,059,000	$85,500,000	N/A
Benin II	1,969,000	$276,400,000	$24,800,000
Burkina Faso	1,181,000	$131,500,000	($123,300,000)
Cape Verde I	385,000	$134,000,000	$84,600,000
Cape Verde II	604,000	$142,800,000	$72,000,000
El Salvador	706,000	$559,600,000	$251,900,000
El Salvador II	6,446,000	$224,500,000	N/A
Georgia	143,000	$123,300,000	$175,600,000
Georgia II	1,770,000	$59,800,000	$18,200,000
Ghana	1,217,000	$979,500,000	$520,400,000
Honduras	1,705,000	$1,626,800,000	$190,400,000
Indonesia[[Indonesia entries are currently available for only one of three projects. Liberia entries are currently available only for the energy project. Benin II entries are unavailable for the off-grid clean energy facility.]]	1,700,000	$217,000,000	N/A
Jordan	3,000,000	$398,900,000	$71,300,000
Lesotho	1,041,000	$701,700,000	$84,700,000
Liberia	528,000	$182,500,000	$8,000,000
Madagascar[[Two compacts have been terminated, Madagascar and Mali. Madagascar's estimates reflect the early termination while Mali's do not.]]	480,000	$123,200,000	$46,800,000
Malawi	983,000	$567,200,000	$234,100,000
Mali[[Two compacts have been terminated, Madagascar and Mali. Madagascar's estimates reflect the early termination while Mali's do not.]]	2,837,000	$299,100,000	$136,300,000
Moldova	414,000	$137,100,000	$39,900,000
Mongolia	2,058,000	$1,479,700,000	$114,600,000
Morocco	1,695,000	$1,139,300,000	$617,000,000
Mozambique	2,685,000	$314,200,000	$120,900,000
Namibia	1,063,000	$405,300,000	$125,000,000
Nicaragua	119,000	$83,500,000	N/A
Niger	3,888,000	$486,200,000	$238,700,000
Philippines	125,822,000	$493,700,000	$159,700,000
Senegal	1,550,000	$279,600,000	$110,600,000
Tanzania	5,425,000	$1,230,700,000	$776,300,000
Vanuatu	39,000	$73,800,000	N/A
Zambia	1,200,000	$306,600,000	$62,200,000
Total for All Compacts[[Column totals may not equal the sum of the individual rows due to rounding.]]	187,138,000	$13,566,200,000

Post Compact Economic Rates of Return

All MCC projects are independently evaluated, and these independent evaluations often include evaluation-based ERRs. Independently calculated ERRs complement the closeout ERRs that MCC calculates at the end of the compact. Because independent evaluations occur two to five years after compact closure, evaluation-based ERRs offer an updated assessment of a project’s costs and benefits post-compact. These ERRs still rely on forecasts for the later portion of MCC’s CBA evaluation horizon, which spans 20 years. Nonetheless, independent evaluation-based ERRs complete the accountability loop in a way that is rare among donors. Two examples are below.

Results of the Mozambique Farmer Income Support Project

MCC’s Farmer Income Support Project (FISP) was designed to reduce damage to the incomes of 1.7 million Mozambican farmers due to Coconut Lethal Yellowing Disease (CLYD). This was to be accomplished through (i) short term surveillance, control and mitigation services, prompt eradication of diseased palms, and replanting with the less susceptible Mozambican Green Tall coconut variety, and (ii) Technical advisory services to introduce crop-diversification options. Given forecast benefits to farmers’ incomes and the costs of the program, MCC originally forecast a project economic rate of return of 25.1 percent.

An independent evaluation of the FISP project’s impacts found that cutting trees and burning tree stumps in epidemic areas did reduce CLYD prevalence, but not to the degree originally forecast, resulting in lower than expected productivity impacts. Likewise, endemic area alternative crop uptake was lower than expected, likely due to insufficient input and output market linkages. The resulting updated, evaluation-based ERR estimate was 16.8 percent. Greater detail on the evaluation and lessons learned are available in MCC’s public evaluation catalogue.[[https://data.MCC.gov/evaluations/index.php/catalog]]

Results of the Nicaragua Transportation Project

MCC’s Nicaragua Transportation Project was designed to stimulate economic development and improve access to markets and social services by reducing transportation costs. It upgraded and rehabilitated 68 km of roads, consisting of two secondary roads and a trunk road. MCC originally forecast an economic return from the project of 13.2 percent based on reduced vehicle operating costs and travel time savings for road users, including new users expected to travel on the road due to improved road conditions resulting from the project.

The independent evaluation of this project estimated actual impacts using data from 2 years after the roads were completed. It found that the road roughness, a key indicator of transport costs, decreased 80 percent on average, and traffic increased 12 percent on average over the 2 years to 3,062 vehicles per day. At the same time, the capital costs for the road works came in on average 2.2 times those estimated prior to implementation. Given this balance of measured benefits and costs, the resulting evaluation-based ERR fell to 2.1 percent, primarily due to these higher costs. (Benefits were roughly consistent with ex-ante estimates.) Greater detail on the evaluation and lessons learned are available in MCC’s public evaluation catalogue,[[https://data.MCC.gov/evaluations/index.php/catalog]] and recently published Principles into Practice: Lessons from MCC’s Investments in Roads.[[https://www.MCC.gov/our-impact/principles-into-practice]]

Investments by Sector as of FY 2018 Q4

Graphic pie chart illustrating MCC investments by sector as percentages of total investments.

Sector	Amount ($ Millions)
Transportation (Road, Water & Air)	$3,328.2
Agriculture	$1,956.8
Health, Education & Community Services	$$1,770.0
Energy	$1,885.7
Program Administration & Monitoring	$1,367.9
Water Supply & Sanitation	$1,387.7
Governance & Land	$652.7
Financial Services	$159.8
Total	$12,508.8

Results by Sector as of FY 2018 Q4

Sector	Indicator Indicators listed are MCC’s common indicators, which are selected to aggregate sector results across countries.	Total Portfolio Actuals Cumulative value for the indicator for both closed and active compacts (2005-	Data Points Number of compacts with available data.	Active and Completed Countries Tracked Underlined text indicates compacts that are still active.
Roads	Temporary employment generated in road construction	50,245	7	Armenia, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, El Salvador, El Salvador II, Georgia, Ghana, Honduras, Liberia, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Philippines, Senegal
Roads	Kilometers of roads completed	3,035	15
Agriculture & Irrigation	Farmers trained	404,477	14	Armenia, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Honduras, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mali, Moldova, Morocco, Morocco II, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Senegal
	Farmers who have applied improved practices as a result of training	126,592	10
	Hectares under improved irrigation	203,963	8
	Value of agricultural and rural loans	$87,074,694	9
Water & Sanitation	Temporary employment generated in water and sanitation construction	21,776	6	Cabo Verde II, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Jordan, Lesotho, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia
	People trained in hygiene and sanitary best practices	12,386	6
	Water points constructed	1,191	4
	Operating cost coverage	86%	4
	Access to improved water supply	68%	3
Education	Students participating	217,474	7	Burkina Faso, El Salvador, El Salvador II, Georgia II, Ghana, Mongolia, Morocco, Morocco II, Namibia
	Facilities completed	804	6
	Graduates from MCC-supported education activities	62,483	5
Land	Legal and regulatory reforms adopted	134	7	Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde II, Ghana, Indonesia, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Morocco II, Mongolia, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Senegal
	Stakeholders trained	77,968	11
	Land administration offices established or upgraded	399	8
	Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system	352,975	8
	Land rights formalized	320,722[[Number decreased due to data revision post-compact.]]	7
Power	Kilometers of lines completed	4,487	5	Benin II, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Ghana II, Indonesia, Liberia, Malawi, Mongolia, Tanzania

Common Indicators

Agriculture and Irrigation Common Indicators:

A focus on results is one of the core principles on which the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) was founded. Within country-specific plans, MCC uses common indicators to aggregate results across countries within certain sectors. MCAs are not required to report on certain common indicators where collecting that data is too costly or infeasible given existing data collection plans.

		Process Indicators					Output Indicators					Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(AI-1) Value of signed irrigation feasibility and design contracts (USD)	(AI-2) Percent disbursed of irrigation feasibility and design contracts	(AI-3) Value of signed irrigation construction contracts (USD)	(AI-4) Percent disbursed of irrigation construction contracts	(AI-5) Temporary employment generated in irrigation	(AI-6) Farmers trained	(AI-7) Enterprises assisted	(AI-8) Hectares under improved irrigation	(AI-9) Loan borrowers	(AI-10) Value of agricultural and rural loans (USD)	(AI-11) Farmers who have applied improved practices as a result of training	(AI-12) Hectares under improved practices as a result of training	(AI-13) Enterprises that have applied improved techniques
MCC Total		54,498,907	83.9%	698,425,169	90.2%	6,908	404,477	4,223	203,963	1,195	87,074,694	126,592	42,226	1,016
EAPLA Total		10,686,574	93.0%	190,892,731	88.1%	2,975	213,082	1,597	11,926	1,099	66,414,932	56,496	7,279	418
AFRICA Total		43,812,333	81.7%	507,532,438	90.9%	3,933	191,395	2,626	192,037	96	20,659,762	70,096	34,947	598
Armenia	EAPLA	4,601,073	100.0%	106,653,443	100.0%	2,389	45,639	227	-	1,008	13,133,200	26,424	-	178
El Salvador		-	-	-	-	-	15,363	281	-	29	4,598,748	11,520	-	163
Georgia		1,155,881	53.4%	-	-	-	-	291	-	-	19,880,003	-	-	-
Honduras		-	-	-	-	-	7,265	464	400	-	17,100,000	6,996	-	-
Indonesia		-	-	-	-	-	129,142	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Moldova		4,929,620	95.7%	84,239,288	73.0%	586	6,569	334	11,526	62	11,702,981	2,452	7,279	77
Nicaragua		-	-	-	-	-	9,104	-	-	-	-	9,104	-	-
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	17,268,474	74.8%	74,339,448	95.3%	2,414	12,307	278	2,240	96	2,802,000	8,237	3,369	28
Cabo Verde I		-	-	5,167,848	97.6%	-	553	-	13	-	617,000	106	-	-
Ghana		5,202,887	100.0%	13,009,963	100.0%	-	66,930	1,724	514	-	16,740,762	59,060	-	535
Madagascar		-	-	-	-	-	31,366	324	-	-	-	1,892	-	1
Mali		9,077,220	98.2%	148,951,503	98.3%	-	1,308	-	97,503	-	500,000	801	-	-
Morocco		-	-	111,353,027	99.0%	-	40,863	114	53,376	-	-	-	31,578	34
Mozambique		-	-	-	-	-	28,830	186	-	-	-	-	-	-
Namibia		-	-	-	-	-	9,238	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Niger		2,573,579	15.8%
Senegal		9,690,173	86.3%	154,710,649	75.0%	1,519	-	-	38,391	-	-	-	-	-
Gender*
Female						227	92,524	107		121	924,102	17,660		20
Male						4,292	205,839	413		1,066	13,580,879	40,077		85

All program data are as of September 10 , 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier Compacts.

Education Common Indicators:

		Process Indicators		Output Indicators			Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(E-1) Value of signed educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts (USD)	(E-2) Percent disbursed of educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts	(E-3) Legal, financial, and policy reforms adopted	(E-4) Educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated	(E-5) Instructors trained	(E-6) Students participating in MCC-supported education activities	(E-7) Graduates from MCC-supported education activities	(E-8) Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities
MCC Total		224,523,414	92.1%	5	804	4,951	217,474	62,483	-
EAPLA Total		82,216,321	80.7%	5	98	2,342	50,466	16,524	-
AFRICA Total		142,307,093	98.7%	-	706	2,609	167,008	45,959	-
El Salvador I	EAPLA	9,857,585	99.8%	-	22	378	30,672	4,285	-
El Salvador II		1,849,447	100%	-	-	-	494	-	-
Georgia II		42,329,961	64.2%	-	58	594	1,820	272	-
Mongolia		28,179,328	97.6%	5	18	1,370	17,480	11,967	-
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	22,758,211	99.9%	-	396	557	31,065	4,035	-
Ghana		18,689,747	100.0%	-	250	-	41,019	-	-
Morocco		4,568,837	76.2%	-	-	2,052	93,424	41,383	-
Morocco II		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Namibia		96,290,298	99.2%	-	60	-	1,500	541	-
Gender*
Female						2,500	73,506	37,031	-
Male						2,451	65,792	20,744	-

All program data are as of September 10, 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts. Indicators in this Results Framework may be added, removed , or modified as MCC’s investments in education evolve over time. ‡ All MCC education programs have as their long-term end goal an increase in individual or household income and a corresponding decrease in poverty.

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier compacts.

Land Common Indicators:

Land Common Indicators
		Output Indicators						Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(L-1) Legal and regulatory reforms adopted	(L-2) Land administration offices established or upgraded	(L-3) Stakeholders trained	(L-4) Conflicts successfully mediated	(L-5) Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system	(L-6) Land rights formalized	(L-7) Percentage change in time for property transactions	(L-8) Percentage change in cost for property transactions
MCC Total		134	399	77,968	12,484	352,975	320,722	NA	NA
EAPLA Total		6	15	8,383	10,639	18,336	20,672	NA	NA
AFRICA Total		128	384	69,585	1,845	334,639	300,050	NA	NA
Indonesia	EAPLA	-	-	4,463	-	-	-	-	-
Mongolia		6	15	3,920	10,639	18,336	20,672	-	-
Nicaragua		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Benin	AFRICA	-	-	50	-	-	-	-	-
Burkina Faso		54	78	61,057	1,364	18,490	4,793	-	-
Cabo Verde II**		36	38	442	229	37,495	11,365	-	-
Ghana		4	3	427	23	1,481	-	-	-
Lesotho***		11	1	575	151	53,296	19,325	-93	-
Madagascar		4	237	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mali		-	1	1,354	-	-	-	-	-
Mozambique		-	26	1,516	-	205,005	251,556	-	-
Morocco II		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Namibia		19	-	2,524	-	8,869	4,356	-	-
Niger
Senegal		-	-	1,640	78	10,003	8,655	-	-
Gender*
Male				54,816			85,400
Female				21,717			54,903
Joint							19,575
Location*
Urban						200,922	156,232
Rural						98,757	124,493

All program data are as of September 10, 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

*Gender and location totals may not match overall totals due to lack of counting by gender and location in earlier Compacts.

**Number decreased due to a correction in data.

***(L-6) Value was corrected after verifying closeout data.

Power Common Indicators:

Power Common Indicators
		Process Indicators					Output Indicators							Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(P-1) Value of signed power infrastructure feasibility and design contracts	(P-2) Percent disbursed of power infrastructure feasibility and design contracts	(P-3) Value of signed power infrastructure construction contracts	(P-4) Percent disbursed of power infrastructure construction contracts	(P-5) Temporary employment generated in power infrastructure construction	(P-6) Generation capacity added	(P-7 and P-10) Km lines upgraded or built	(P-8) Transmission throughput capacity added	(P-9 and P-11) Substation capacity added	(P-12) Customers added by project	(P-13) Maintenance expenditure-asset value ratio	(P-14) Cost-reflective tariff regime	(P-15) Total electricity supply	(P-16) Power plant availability	(P-17) Installed generation capacity	(P-18) Transmission system technical losses (%)	(P-19) Distribution system losses	(P-20) Commercial losses	(P-21) System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI)	(P-22) System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI)	(P-23) Total electricity sold	(P-24) Operating cost-recovery ratio	(P-25) Percentage of households connected to the national grid	(P-26) Share of renewable energy in the country
MCC Total		66,770,017	57.9%	513,244,714	80.6%	6,407	79	4,487	NA	84	44,507	NA	NA	18,221,134	NA	6,226	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	3,508,844	NA	NA	NA
EAPLA Total		-	0.0%	0	0.0%	-	13	1,692	NA	-	44,507	NA	NA	0	NA	0	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	0	NA	NA	NA
AFRICA total		66,770,017	57.9%	513,244,714	80.6%	6,407	66	2,796	NA	84	-	NA	NA	18,221,134	NA	6,226	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	3,508,844	NA	NA	NA
El Salvador	EAPLA	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,523	-	-	35,412	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Georgia		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Indonesia		-	-	-	-	-	13	169	-	-	9,095	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mongolia		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Benin II	AFRICA	11,490,471	15.9%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,210,105	-	-	-		-			983,825	-	-	-
Ghana		-	-	-	-	-	-	99				-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Ghana II		20,390,434	23.3%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.0	-	15,081,024	70.3	4,677	-	25.46,31.9****	20.4	18.47; 23.84****	17.04; 13.73****	694,000	60	-	-
Liberia***		-	-	136,638,866	100.0%	-	66	24	-	84	-	-	-	111,724	67	141	-		-	19	15	43,621	-	6	47
Malawi		19,141,688	78.4%	223,053,295	65.5%	2,334	-	-	-	-	-	13.8	-	1,818,282	80	459	5.7	15.1	-	-	-	1,461,629	395	11	100
Tanzania		15,747,424	108.6%	153,552,553	85.3%	4,073	-	2,673	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	949	-	-	-	-	-	325,769	-	-	-
T&D
Transmission								24	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Distribution								4,294	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gender*
Female						170
Male						2,164
Grid
On-grid							66	8								5,212
Off-grid							-	5								65.0
Tariff class
Residential											-											1,267,299
Commercial											-											288,350
Industrial											-											233,281

All program data are as of September 10, 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

P-13, P-15, P-23 and P-24 are classified as Level (cumulative) indicators. This means that the number will be reported at the end of Compact year as to represent the total value in a given year.

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier compacts.

** This is a monitoring indicator and cannot be attributed solely to MCC investment.

*** Not all common indicator data for Liberia was included for this quarter as the data is still being verified.

****In Ghana II there are two utilities who report different number for Distribution System Losses, SAIDI, and SAIFI. P-19 -ECG: 25.46, NEDCo: 31.9 P-21 - ECG: 18.47, NEDCo: 26.5 P-22 - ECG: 17.04, NEDCo: 13.73

Roads Common Indicators:

		Process Indicators							Output Indicators	Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(R-1) Value of signed road feasibility and design contracts	(R-2) Percent disbursed of road feasibility and design contracts	(R-3) Kilometers of roads under design	(R-4) Value of signed road construction contracts	(R-5) Percent disbursed of road construction contracts	(R-6) Kilometers of roads under works contracts	(R-7) Temporary employment generated in road construction	(R-8) Kilometers of roads completed	(R-9) Roughness	(R-10) Average annual daily traffic	(R-11) Road traffic fatalities
MCC Total		130,499,160	96.7%	4,685	2,408,861,462	86.5%	3,944	50,245	3,035	NA	NA	655
EAPLA Total		64,075,771	93%	1,791	1,147,558,152	86%	1860.8	1,732	1,749	-	-	-
AFRICA Total		67,580,420	98%	2,895	1,261,303,310	87%	2083.4	48,513	1,286	-	-	651
Armenia	EAPLA	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24.4	3.47	735	-
El Salvador I		18,321,410	99%	223	248,378,825	97%	223.0	-	223.32	-	-	-
El Salvador II		-	-	32.4	62,902,840	1%	26.6	423	-	-	-	-
Georgia		11,980,000	99%	-	197,299,030	100%	220.2	-	220.20	1.50	1,092	-
Honduras		9,500,000	75%	673	179,400,000	72%	673.0	-	610.10	-	-	-
Moldova		-	-	96	100,807,443	96%	96.0	1,309	96	-	-	4
Mongolia		6,083,650	89%	19.3	73,108,907	91%	176.4	-	176.40	1.90	353	-
Nicaragua		-	-	375.5	56,507,526	100%	74.0	-	74.0	-	-	-
Philippines		15,235,623	94%	222.0	173,156,531	81%	222.0	-	175.0	-	-	-
Vanuatu		2,955,088	100%	149.7	55,997,051	97%	149.7	-	149.70	3.00	-	-
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	8,339,651	115%	536	140,205,145	102%	419.1	4,162	277.80	-	-	6
Cape Verde I		3,520,000	92%	63	24,280,000	100%	40.6	-	40.60	2.00		-
Ghana		5,549,044	100%	943	250,604,022	100%	446.4	35,455	445.03		-	602
Liberia		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mali		-	-	-	42,918,038	35%	81.0	-	79.00	-	-	-
Mozambique**		17,669,992	85%	253	132,240,557	88%	253.0	2,308	253		-	-
Niger		1,157,031		220
Senegal		12,201,371	102%	406	271,128,882	70%	375.0	2,757	***	-	-	43
Tanzania		19,143,331	107%	473	399,926,666	91%	468.34	3,831	190.14	-	-	-
Gender*
Male								13,613				45
Female								1,267				4
Road Type*
Primary		65,222,944	23%	2,093	1,405,547,708	86%	1,894		1,177.58
Secondary		24,735,623	87%	1,374	617,229,323	85%	1,133		478.65
Tertiary		6,719,183	112%	935	164,505,401	66%	681		1,077.77

All program data are as of September 10, 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

*Gender and road type totals may not match overall totals due to lack of counting by gender and road type in earlier Compacts.

** The kilometers of roads completed for Mozambique is provisional data. Subject to change after verification of takeover certificates.

*** According to the Common Indicator definition, a road is completed when official certificates are handed over and approved. In Senegal, this was taken to mean final acceptance of the road works, which typically happens after the end of the 1 year defects liability period which starts when the construction is completed and the roads are provisionally accepted. As part of its Compact, Senegal intended to rehabilitate 372 kilometers of national roads. By September 2015, when the Senegal Compact closed, no roads had achieved final acceptance, and therefore were not officially completed, per the common indicator definition. However, by the end of the Compact, 185km of roads had been fully rehabilitated and had received provisional acceptance. An additional 72km were provisionally accepted in November 2015, and the remaining 116km are anticipated to be provisionally accepted with the support of the Government of Senegal by mid-2016.

Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Common Indicators:

Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Common Indicators
		Process Indicators					Output Indicators		Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(WS-1) Value of signed water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts (USD)	(WS-2) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts	(WS-3) Value of signed water and sanitation construction contracts (USD)	(WS-4) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation construction contracts	(WS-5) Temporary employment generated in water and sanitation construction	(WS-6) People trained in hygiene and sanitary best practices	(WS-7) Water points constructed	(WS-8) Non revenue water	(WS-9) Continuity of service	(WS-10) Operating cost coverage	(WS-11) Volume of water produced**	(WS-12) Access to improved water supply	(WS-13) Access to improved sanitation	(WS-14)** Residential water consumption	(WS-15)** Industrial/Commercial water consumption	(WS-16)** Prevalence of diarrhea
MCC Total		54,337,691	97.6%	817,638,658	85.6%	21,776	12,386	1,191	51.1%	NA	NA	218,574,530	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
EAPLA Total		5,250,665	96.2%	303,498,694	98.8%	3,825	2,406	-	50.7%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
AFRICA Total		49,087,026	97.8%	514,139,963	77.8%	17,951	9,980	1,191	51.4%	-	-	218,574,530	-	-	-	-	-
El Salvador	EAPLA	4,983,800	96.0%	10,451,448	97.5%	-	2,406	-	-	-	-	-	83.0%	88%
Georgia		266,865	100.0%	54,315,000	94.2%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jordan		-	-	238,732,246	100%	3,825	-	-	50.7%	7.35***	85.6%	-	-	67%	54.1	-	3.1
Cabo Verde II	AFRICA	783,369	93.6%	19,315,569	97.5%	759	32	-	78.9%	7.7	45%	-	98.52%	74.8	15.6		-
Ghana		1,475,148	100.0%	13,949,465	100.0%	-	778	392	-	-	-	-	-	-	36.0	-	-
Lesotho*****		-	-	59,733,645	79%	11,527	454	175	27.0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Mozambique		35,076,009	99.1%	169,500,497	87.5%	2,276	8,400	614	-	-	-	-	23.4%	-	19.5	-	-
Tanzania		6,861,280	102.1%	45,403,796	81.1%	387	-	-	48.8%	-	113.1%	200,330,000	-	-	166.5	998,439.6	-
Zambia		4,891,220	82.5%	206,236,991	65.5%	3,002	316	10	51.0%	17	98.4%	18,244,530	-	-	-	-	-
Gender*
Female						1,123	5,913
Male						8,739	6,019

All program data are as of September 10, 2018. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier compacts.

** This is a monitoring indicator; any change over baseline data represents the current trend and does not represent the direct impact of the MCC-investment.

*** Jordan's M&E Plan has, throughout the life of the compact, defined hours of supply as hours/week. As such all documentation is in this form. The value here has been divided by 7 here to accurately reflect supply hours per day.

****(WS-8): In Cabo Verde II the utility is in transition and during this period it has experienced challenges with its billing system and low collection rates, which accounts for some of the high rates of Non revenue water.

****The current unit for volume of water produced has a discrepancy. MCC M&E is in the process of revising this common indicator to clarify and align with current industry standards.

*****Value decreased after verifying closeout data.

FY 2019 Corporate Goals

For FY 2019, MCC management established three specific goals to guide agency planning and performance for the year. As in past years, these corporate goals are the starting point for annual department and division goal-setting, from which staff develop their individual performance plans. Below you will find MCC’s FY 2019 corporate goals with additional updates.

Corporate Priority	Updates
Strengthen MCC as a Leader in Development	To better support the US’s priorities in development, MCC is intensifying its focus on data and evidence-driven results while actively participating in the National Security Strategy and related inter-agency efforts on foreign assistance. Additionally, MCC intends to closely assist with the set-up of the new International Development Finance Corporation in order to ensure seamless coordination with the DFC once operational. MCC had a key participating role in in the President’s launch of the Women’s Global Development and Prosperity (WGDP) Initiative in February 2019, and will continue to incorporate the principles of WGDP into its programs, indicators, and reporting objectives.
Develop, Implement, Monitor and Evaluate High Quality and Innovative Programs	MCC signed a $550 million compact with Senegal on December 2018, which includes a $50 million contribution from the Government of Senegal. The agency is closely monitoring ongoing concerns in Sri Lanka to determine the best path forward. MCC is also working with The Gambia to present a successful threshold program to the MCC Board to at the end of FY 2019. In January 2019, MCC successfully completed close out of its first compact with Malawi, and is on schedule to complete close outs in Zambia, Georgia, and Honduras within the year. MCC will enter-into-force on $524 million compact with Cote d’Ivoire in 2019 and is actively exploring regional integration opportunities in five of our current country partners in Africa. The agency is currently engaging with each country to determine if there are project opportunities that meet MCC’s investment criteria, as well as evaluating the countries’ ability to work together in a regional capacity. Lastly, MCC continues to monitor implementation progress across the compact and threshold program portfolio.
Enhance Organizational Health, Operational Effectiveness and Agility	For FY 2019, MCC is pursuing five initiatives for enhancing organizational health and operational effectiveness. This includes advancing the agency’s internal knowledge management initiative, investing in human capital, focusing on compact implementation efficiencies, strengthening practice groups to improve the quality of operations, and increasing outreach to U.S. business around opportunities to participate in, leverage and invest alongside MCC’s overseas activities. MCC’s knowledge management initiative is well underway, with a detailed action plan in place to increase internal efficiency and development of a new intranet set to deploy this year. To better prioritize investment in human capital, MCC conducted an organizational health workshop and is codifying feedback from this event into a larger agency plan. Additionally, implementation of a new workforce management system is in progress and is set to launch in late summer. Following last year’s success, MCC plans to conduct another “efficiency challenge” to review staff proposals on potential improvements to the compact implementation process. MCC also plans to strengthen internal practice groups by developing and updating technical guidance, and by issuing the first round of completed Star Reports for closed compacts.