Appendix: FY 2015 Annual Performance Report

Compact Signing Amounts and Key Dates (in millions of $)*

Partner Country	Sub-Saharan Africa	Europe, Asia and Pacific	Middle East and N. Africa	Latin America	Signing	Entry Into Force	Closed Dates
Madagascar	109.8				4/18/2005	7/27/2005	8/31/2009
Honduras				215.0	6/13/2005	9/29/2005	9/29/2010
Cabo Verde	110.1				7/4/2005	10/17/2005	10/17/2010
Nicaragua				175.0	7/14/2005	5/26/2006	5/26/2011
Georgia, 2005		395.3			9/12/2005	4/7/2006	4/7/2011
Benin, 2006	307.3				2/22/2006	10/6/2006	10/6/2011
Vanuatu		65.7			3/2/2006	4/28/2006	4/28/2011
Armenia		235.7			3/27/2006	9/29/2006	9/29/2011
Ghana, 2006	547.0				8/1/2006	2/16/2007	2/16/2012
Mali	460.8				11/13/2006	9/17/2007	8/24/2012
El Salvador, 2006				460.9	11/29/2006	9/20/2007	9/20/2012
Mozambique	506.9				7/13/2007	9/22/2008	9/22/2013
Lesotho, 2007	362.6				7/23/2007	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Morocco, 2007			697.5		8/31/2007	9/15/2008	9/15/2013
Mongolia		284.9			10/22/2007	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Tanzania, 2008	698.1				2/17/2008	9/17/2008	9/17/2013
Burkina Faso	480.9				7/14/2008	7/31/2009	7/31/2014
Namibia	304.5				7/28/2008	9/16/2009	9/16/2014
Senegal	540.0				9/16/2009	9/23/2010	9/23/2015
Moldova		262.0			1/22/2010	9/1/2010	9/1/2015
Philippines, 2010		433.9			9/23/2010	5/25/11
Jordan			275.1		10/25/2010	12/13/11
Malawi	350.7				4/7/2011	9/20/2013
Indonesia		600.0			11/19/2011	4/2/2013
Cabo Verde, 2012	66.2				2/10/2012	11/30/2012
Zambia	354.8				5/10/2012	11/15/2013
Georgia, 2013		140.0			6/26/2013	7/1/2014
Ghana, 2014	498.2				8/5/2014	1/20/2016
El Salvador, 2014				277.0	9/30/2014	9/9/2015
Benin, 2015	375.0				9/9/2015
Liberia	256.7				10/2/2015
Morocco, 2015			450.0		11/30/2015

* Please note that the values above are the signed compact amounts and do not reflect lower actual expenditures due to early terminations or funds for a compact not being fully spent. The table on the next page reflects the net obligations/commitments associated with each compact.

Compact Obligations/Commitments by Year Appropriated as of December 2015 ($ millions)*

Obls./Commitments	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	Total
Armenia		177													177
Benin 2006		302													302
Benin 2015										207		168			375
Burkina Faso					475										475
Cape Verde 2005	109														109
Cape Verde 2012									66						66
El Salvador 2006			362	88											450
El Salvador 2014				8					109	160					277
Georgia 2005	290	24		17	56										387
Georgia 2013									140						140
Ghana 2006		536													536
Ghana 2014			17							283	198				498
Honduras	204														204
Indonesia		55						545							600
Jordan						55	220								275
Lesotho 2007				358											358
Liberia												257			257
Madagascar	86														86
Malawi							210	141							351
Mali			436												436
Moldova	91	16	8	1	9	87	50								262
Mongolia 2007				269											269
Morocco 2007		72	578												650
Morocco 2015			3	14	14	21	8	51	3	1	169	166			450
Mozambique				448											448
Namibia				219	76										296
Nicaragua	113														113
Philippines 2010							434								434
Senegal						516									516
Tanzania 2008					695										695
Vanuatu		65													65
Zambia									355						355
Planned
Lesotho 2017	0	15		5	4	30	1	2	7	6	8	13	97	22	210
Mongolia 2017				7		16			58	10	100	69			260
Nepal														301	301
Niger				58									392		450
Philippines 2017														430	430
Senegal						(51)									(51)
Tanzania 2016			53	14			18				210		178		473
Total	892	1,262	1,457	1,506	1,328	674	941	739	738	667	685	673	667	753	12,982

Threshold Program Signing Amounts (in millions of $)

Country	Sub-Saharan Africa	Eurasia	Latin America	Middle East and N. Africa	Signing Date	Completion Date
Burkina Faso	12.9				7/22/2005	9/30/2008
Malawi	20.9				9/23/2005	9/30/2008
Albania, 2006		13.9			4/3/2006	11/15/2008
Tanzania	11.2				5/3/2006	12/30/2008
Paraguay, 2006			34.6		5/8/2006	8/31/2009
Zambia	22.7				5/22/2006	2/28/2009
Philippines		20.7			7/26/2006	5/29/2009
Jordan				25.0	10/17/2006	8/29/2009
Indonesia		55.0			11/17/2006	12/31/2010
Ukraine		44.5			12/4/2006	12/31/2009
Moldova		24.7			12/14/2006	2/28/2010
Kenya	12.7				3/23/2007	12/31/2010
Uganda	10.4				3/29/2007	12/31/2009
Guyana			6.7		8/23/2007	2/23/2010
Sao Tome & Principe	8.7				11/9/2007	4/15/2011
Kyrgyz Republic		16.0			3/14/2008	6/30/2010
Niger	23.1				3/17/2008	12/31/2015
Peru			35.6		6/9/2008	9/30/2012
Rwanda	24.7				9/24/2008	12/31/2011
Albania, 2008		15.7			9/29/2008	7/31/2011
Paraguay, 2009			30.3		4/13/2009	7/31/2012
Liberia	15.1				7/6/2010	12/1/2013
Timor-Leste		10.5			9/22/2010	3/31/2014
Honduras			15.6		8/29/2013	In progress
Guatemala			28.0		4/8/2015	In progress
Sierra Leone	44.4				11/17/2015	In progress

Results of Recently Closed Compacts – Moldova and Senegal

Moldova

The $262 million Moldova Compact aimed to reduce poverty and accelerate economic growth by enabling improved agricultural productivity and expanding access to markets and services through critical infrastructure investments in the irrigation and road sectors, and capacity building in the high-value agriculture sector. The compact focused on transitioning farmers from grains and cereals to higher-value crops like fruits and vegetables, as well as the rehabilitation of a 59.7-mile stretch of road connecting Sarateni and Soroca in the country's north.

Moldova
Policy Reforms	Road Rehabiliation Project Annual road maintenance funding increased by 64 percent between 2010 and 2015, respectively. Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project Enactment of Water Law and implementing regulations; law aligns water management with European Union standards. Ministry of Environment implementing River Basin Management Plans for the Nistru & Prut Rivers. 11 Water Users Associations created with over 7,350 members, 2,800 (more than 38 percent) are women. Enactment of Water Users Association Law; allows asset management transfer of irrigation systems to water users associations.
Outputs	Road Rehabilitation Project A 59.7-mile segment of the M2 highway between the Sarateni junction and Soroca was completed in September 2014, on time and with a savings of approximately $21 million. The project also included about $2.5 million in small community infrastructure improvements in towns and villages along the road, including about 20 km of paved access roads to schools, wells and community facilities. The project also includes an extension of the M2 road to the Soroca Fire & Rescue Station and yard works at the station. Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project 10 irrigation systems were completely rehabilitated, with construction completed prior to the September 1, 2015 compact end-date, covering more than 11,500 hectares of farmland. Farmers also received training and the necessary equipment to make use of and manage the rehabilitated irrigation systems. Under the joint USAID/MCC Growing High-Value Agriculture Sales Activity, at least 6,569 farmers were trained and at least $29,954,859 in sales of high-value produce was facilitated, in part, by funding the participation of Moldovan exporters in international fruit expos.
Preliminary and Expected Outcomes	Road Rehabilitation Project The rehabilitated road is expected to reduce the cost and time required to transport goods and services to market. Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project Part of the Moldova compact was a $17 million credit program targeting the high-value agriculture chains. One part of this activity was a credit program that funded post-harvest infrastructure like cold storage that will help Moldovan produce reach and compete in export markets. The second part of the credit program was an equipment leasing activity that supplied equipment leases (hire-purchases) to farmers so they could invest in on-farm irrigation and other equipment necessary for growing high-value crops. Credit was approved for approximately 140 farmers and groups of farmers, and the revolving nature of these funds is designed to have an impact over the coming years beyond the invested $17 million.
Evaluations	Road Rehabilitation Project MCC expects to contract an independent evaluator to: (i) determine the post-compact ERR using HDM-4 analysis, (ii) assess the road maintenance regime, (iii) analyze the composition of road users, and (iv) assess the transportation market structure. The evaluation is scheduled to be conducted in Fall 2017, after a 3-year exposure period, with a final report to be submitted in 2018. Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project The main goal of the evaluation of the THVA Project is to determine the extent, if any, to which the various activities improved the productivity and profitability of farm operations in the rehabilitated CIS and Extension areas. The baseline Farm Operator Survey (FOS) took place in 2014, covering the 2013 agricultural season. Two follow-up rounds for the FOS are scheduled: the first in 2019, covering the 2018 agricultural season; and the final in 2021, covering the 2020 agricultural season. The AAF survey was conducted in 2015 and covered both past and planned investments. Four rounds of qualitative data collection have been completed, and three additional rounds are planned between 2017 and 2022.

Senegal

The $540 million compact with Senegal aimed to boost economic growth by unlocking the country’s agricultural productivity and expanding access to markets and services through investments in roads and irrigation networks. The two primary compact projects, roads rehabilitation and irrigation and water resource management, were geographically focused in the Senegal River Valley in the north and the Casamance region in the south. The compact priorities were identified to align to the country’s long-term objectives of enhancing economic growth and food security.

Senegal
Policy Reforms	Road Rehabilitation Project In Year 4, MCC and the Government of Senegal (GoS) redrafted the Road Project Condition Precedent (CP) that was meant to reduce the funding gap for road maintenance. The revised CP more clearly articulated expectations for the GoS to put in place needed planning, funding and management related to road network maintenance via an action plan. By compact end, the GoS had achieved the deliverables set forth in the action plan and showed significant progress on reinforcement of road maintenance planning and spending management that will ultimately reduce overall user costs and promote economic growth. Irrigation and Water Resource Management The irrigation CP that required the GoS to put in place an action plan for improved irrigation maintenance was met on time, but demonstration of compliance was at times late and lacking in quality. By Year 5, the GoS showed very positive improvement on key components, notably the implementation of sound maintenance programming based on use of a hydraulic model and multi-year funding. The first application of this methodology was seen in 2015, Year 5 of the Compact.
Outputs	Road Rehabilitation Project 121 km of the National Road 2 (RN2) and the Ndioum Bridge were rehabilitated from Richard Toll to Ndioum in northern Senegal, along the intervention zones of the Irrigation and Water Resources Management Project. In the South (originally 252 km from Ziguinchor to Kounkané), 64 km of the National Road 6 (RN6) from Kolda to Kounkané were fully rehabilitated and the Kolda Bridge. An additional 72 km section of the RN6 from Tanaff to Kolda was fully paved. The remaining 116 km section of RN6 from Ziguinchor to Tanaff is to be completed by the Government of Senegal by mid-2016. Irrigation and Water Resource Management In the Delta zone, 17 water control structures were constructed along with 229 km of irrigation and drainage canal rehabilitation and expansion benefitting 35,480 hectares of agriculture land. In addition, the project rehabilitated a water control gate for the downstream reservoir serving the city of St. Louis’ water supply. In Ngalenka (Department of Podor), 450 hectares of new irrigated perimeters with total water control were constructed. 8,655 households in total received land use rights titles corresponding to 15,246 hectares as part of the land tenure security activity of the project.
Preliminary and Expected Outcomes	Road Rehabilitation Project By 2029, the compact is anticipated to help improve the living conditions of 1.55 million people, which represents approximately 138,000 households, including 102,000 households in the Casamance region and 36,000 others in northern Senegal. Rehabilitation of the RN2, which is a strategic link between Senegal and neighboring countries of Mauritania and Mali, and the construction of the Ndioum Bridge will stimulate internal and cross border trade and transport of farming products, goods and services from the irrigated areas along the Senegal River Valley. As a result of more than three decades of conflict, certain areas and farmlands in the Casamance have been abandoned. The rehabilitation of the RN6 and the Kolda Bridge will open up the southern part of Senegal and promote economic activity by easing trade and transportation of local farming products and other goods and services between the Casamance and other regions in Senegal and neighboring countries. Over the next 20 years, an additional 102,000 households (about 1.1 million people) are expected to directly benefit from the entire road project activity. Irrigation and Water Resource Management Investments in the Delta zone and, the rice production heartland of Senegal, are expected to increase the volume of irrigable water and expand cropping intensity on land previously at risk of abandonment due to soil salinization and insufficient water flows. Farmers anticipate expansion of their rice, tomato, onion and other market vegetable cultivation in the fertile Senegal River Valley. The Land Tenure Security Activity assisted project beneficiaries in receiving rights to their parcels, and to mitigate potential conflicts that often result from increased land values in irrigated areas. In addition, the land activity developed and implemented transparent, fair and efficient processes for land allocation to promote equitable and secure access to land in the intervention zones. Over the next 20 years, the irrigation investments are expected to benefit over 260,000 Senegalese, with a total estimated increase in household income of approximately $345 million.
Evaluations	Road Rehabilitation Project MCC will contract an independent evaluator to: (i) determine the post-compact economic rate of return using HDM-4 analysis, (ii) assess the road maintenance regime, (iii) analyze the composition of road users, and (iv) assess the transportation market structure. The evaluation is scheduled to be completed in Fall 2018, after a 3-year exposure period, with a final report to be submitted in 2019. Irrigation and Water Resource Management MCC will contract an independent evaluator to assess the impacts of the irrigation project on household income, agricultural productivity, and land tenure security. The evaluation is anticipated to be completed in 2018 after a 3-year exposure period, with a final report to be submitted in 2019.

Compact Modifications

MCC employs a risk-based approach to the management of its foreign assistance portfolio and uses a number of mechanisms for managing projects that face potential major modifications, including:

Quarterly portfolio reviews of all compacts, with a focus on high-risk projects and activities;
Early identification of high-risk projects;
Close collaboration with partner countries to develop plans to prevent, mitigate and manage project restructuring; and
Approval of modifications at the appropriate level.

MCC has also refined its compact development process to conduct adequate due diligence on programs in advance of compact signing to increase the reliability of technical, cost, and other estimates. During compact development MCC also makes project design modifications to mitigate potential completion risk, currency fluctuations and the potential for construction cost overruns.

Summary of Restructurings and Reallocations in FY 2015

Country	Project	Programmatic Change	Description
Philippines	Kalahi-CIDSS Project Secondary National Roads Development Project	Addition to Kalahi-CIDSS subprojects ($12 million), and Secondary National Roads Development Project ($11 million) and reduction in scope of Revenue Administration Reform Project’s Electronic Tax Information System (eTIS) sub-activity and compact savings ($23 million).	In July 2015, MCC approved an aggregate reallocation of $23 million from total anticipated compact savings, of which up to $12 million was used to fund additional Kalahi-CIDSS subprojects, and up to $11 million would be used to cover a projected budget shortfall on the Secondary National Roads Development Project. These reallocations were to balance a reduction in scope of the Revenue Administration Reform Project’s Electronic Tax Information System (eTIS) sub-activity, and savings in program management and oversight.

Estimating Compact Beneficiaries and Benefits

Under MCC's results framework, beneficiaries are defined as an individual and all members of his or her household, who will experience an income gain as a result of MCC interventions. MCC considers that the entire household will benefit from the income gain and counts are multiplied by the average household size in the area or country. The beneficiary standard makes a distinction between individuals participating in a project and individuals expected to increase their income as a result of the project. Before signing a compact, MCC estimates the expected long-term income gains through a rigorous benefit-cost analysis. MCC may reassess and modify its beneficiary estimates and/or the present value of benefits when project designs change during implementation.

Compact[[The table includes estimates for compacts that have entered into force and have ERRs from which income benefit calculations can be drawn. Information for Indonesia is only available for one out of three projects at this time.]][[These estimates generally do not include the projected beneficiaries of projects or activities that have been terminated or suspended by MCC (Madagascar, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mali, and Armenia). In the case of Madagascar, the estimates account for the compact's early termination.]]	Estimated Number of Beneficiaries	Estimated Long Term Income Gain Over the Life of the Project (PV of Benefits)[[The Present Value (PV) of Benefits is the sum of all projected benefits accruing over the life of the project, typically 20 years, evaluated at a 10 percent discount rate. Estimates are reported in millions of U.S. dollars in the year that the ERR analysis was completed. Because the PV of benefits uses a discount rate, these figures cannot be compared directly to the undiscounted financial costs of MCC compacts, but must be compared to the PV of costs instead.]]
Armenia	428,000	$295,500,000
Benin	14,059,000	$409,600,000
Burkina Faso	1,181,000	$151,000,000
Cape Verde 2005	385,000	$149,500,000
Cape Verde 2012	604,000	$112,900,000
El Salvador	706,000	$377,800,000
Georgia 2005	143,000	$301,300,000
Georgia 2013	1,770,000	$338,000,000
Ghana	1,217,000	$690,300,000
Honduras	1,705,000	$237,300,000
Indonesia1	1,700,000	$217,000,000
Jordan	3,000,000	$398,900,000
Lesotho	1,041,000	$485,000,000
Madagascar	480,000	$123,200,000
Malawi	983,000	$567,200,000
Mali	2,837,000	$393,600,000
Moldova	414,000	$259,900,000
Mongolia	2,058,000	$314,800,000
Morocco	1,695,000	$805,400,000
Mozambique	2,685,000	$288,900,000
Namibia	1,063,000	$310,400,000
Nicaragua	119,000	$83,500,000
Philippines	125,822,000	$483,300,000
Senegal	1,550,000	$625,000,000
Tanzania	5,425,000	$1,474,000,000
Vanuatu	39,000	$73,800,000
Zambia	1,230,000	$283,300,000
Total[[Column totals may not equal the sum of the individual rows due to rounding.]]	174,339,000	$10,250,300,000

Sectors Results At A Glance: By The Numbers

Numbers are cumulative over the 11 years since the agency's founding in 2004, and current as of September 2015.

All developing countries face significant challenges in many sectors. The first step in MCC’s process–once a country is selected as eligible–is to work with partner country officials to conduct a rigorous, joint economic analysis to identify the most binding constraints to economic growth. The results help to prioritize MCC’s investments in the areas that are the biggest impediments to private investment and poverty reduction. These may include access to credit, governance, power, transportation, and education, among other priority areas. The constraints are different for each country and ultimately drive our investment strategy. Below are highlights of MCC’s sector investments that have emerged from this analysis.

Power

2,675 miles of electricity lines completed
MCC works with partner countries to build key power infrastructure and implement complementary reforms to improve their power sectors. For example, during the second year of compact implementation, Malawi’s power utility, ESCOM, received technical assistance to improve its performance. In Ghana, the government took significant steps to invite private-sector participation in its power sector by issuing a request for expression of interest in the concession of the Electricity Company of Ghana. In Benin, MCC signed a compact to fund infrastructure in generation and distribution as well as off-grid projects while also strengthening Benin’s national utility.

Transportation

1,787 miles of roads completed
647 additional miles of roadway under construction
In FY 2015, an 18 percent increase in MCC-funded miles of roadway relative to the previous year brought the estimated total to 1,787 miles. In Moldova, the MCC-funded Road Rehabilitation Project rebuilt close to 60 miles of road connecting apple orchards and fruit producers in the north to markets of Chisinau, central Moldova and beyond. All construction met high quality and environmental standards with enhanced safety features.

In the Philippines, the first 10-mile section of the Secondary National Road Project in the Samar and Eastern Samar provinces was completed. The Philippines roads are designed and built to be resilient to the effects of a changing climate and the work includes the rehabilitation and replacement of 60 bridges, rebuilding of major drainage structures, and remediation of dozens of landslides in the provinces.
In Senegal, the rehabilitation and widening of 115 miles of two existing critically important national roads is expected to significantly reduce transport costs for passengers and goods.

Water And Sanitation

7.02 million people are estimated to benefit from improved water systems, and approximately 2.27 million people benefit from improved sanitation
MCC supports transformative policy and institutional reforms to improve the level and quality of water and sanitation services in partner countries. With MCC funding, the Government of Cabo Verde created a new national regulator and improved the legal and policy framework for the water and sanitation sector. MCC supported the creation of Aguas de Santiago, a water and sanitation company on Cabo Verde’s largest island. In addition, MCC helped mobilize additional donor funding from the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility to help corporatize water utility on the islands of Santo Vicente and São Nicolau.

Agriculture And Irrigation

275,094 farmers trained
300,962 acres under improved irrigation
MCC works with partner countries on policies and procedures to better manage water resources used for agricultural production. Without appropriate water resource management, crops are subject to floods and droughts, creating drastic price and yield fluctuations. Ten centralized irrigation systems covering over 11,500 hectares were rebuilt through the Moldova Compact, and Water Users Associations were formed and its members trained to manage their operations and maintenance. A farmer training program in high-value crop production and an agricultural finance program also contributed to the growth and modernization of Moldova’s high-value agriculture sector.

Land

311,785 household, commercial, and legal entities have legal land protections
MCC’s work with partner countries on complex land institutional and policy reforms focuses activities at the regional and local levels to protect property rights and to stimulate private-sector investment. In Senegal, MCC’s investment in large-scale irrigation in the Senegal River Valley was coupled with activities to secure land rights, improve community-level land management, and mitigate the risk of land conflict amid increasing land values. Nine communes received improved land management tools, including computerized land information systems, land rights registries, updated land occupation and management plans, and training of land conflict mediation committees. Each commune developed transparent land allocation principles and criteria with the active participation of all local stakeholders, resulting in unprecedented levels of increased access to irrigated land for women and other relatively land-poor farmers.

Education

746 educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated
4,407 instructors trained
215,242 students participated in MCC-supported education activities
62,211 graduates from MCC-supported education activities
MCC works with partner countries to identify challenges in the education sector and develop solutions that help lead to a skilled and productive workforce.

For example, in Georgia, Ilia State University, Georgian Technical University, and Tbilisi State University accepted its first freshman class for three new MCC-funded bachelor degree science programs launched in partnership with San Diego State University in chemistry/bio-chemistry, electric engineering and computer engineering. MCA-Georgia also selected 29 organizations to submit full proposals to a facility designed to make up to $8.8 million in grants to public and private TVET providers to partner with and secure co-financing from local and international industry to support science, engineering and technology-oriented workforce skills.
More than $10 million in grants was awarded by MCA-Indonesia through the Green Knowledge Program to capture and disseminate new knowledge for the low-carbon economy generated by interaction among public and private sector stakeholders. The investment also supports green skills such as carbon mitigation planning, farming and agriculture waste management, and coastal resource management for governments and citizens in the communities targeted by the Green Prosperity Project. The $332.5 million project is designed to increase productivity and reduce reliance on fossil fuels by expanding renewable energy, improving land use practices and management of natural resources.

Health

More than 2,000 service providers trained to improve nutrition among children in 5,300 villages
Where national growth is potentially stymied by poor health, MCC investments can help governments make critical, cost-effective health services available where they have the most potential to make a difference in enhancing the quality of life, leading to greater productivity and economic growth. MCC committed more than $130 million to improve nutrition and health in Indonesia. Activities in the Indonesia Compact are improving awareness of maternal and infant feeding practices, and illness prevention, as well as access to proper nutrition and health care services. In Indonesia, MCC partners with the World Bank to provide grants to communities to improve health and education indicators. In 2014, an average of 13 cases of underweight children and eight cases of malnutrition among pregnant women were resolved per village, and on average, 178 women and infants per village received parenting or nutritional counseling using community grant funds.

Agriculture and Irrigation Common Indicators:

		Process Indicators					Output Indicators					Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(AI-1) Value of signed irrigation feasibility and design contracts (USD)	(AI-2) Percent disbursed of irrigation feasibility and design contracts	(AI-3) Value of signed irrigation construction contracts (USD)	(AI-4) Percent disbursed of irrigation construction contracts	(AI-5) Temporary employment generated in irrigation	(AI-6) Farmers trained	(AI-7) Enterprises assisted	(AI-8) Hectares under improved irrigation	(AI-9) Loan borrowers	(AI-10) Value of agricultural and rural loans (USD)	(AI-11) Farmers who have applied improved practices as a result of training	(AI-12) Hectares under improved practices as a result of training	(AI-13) Enterprises that have applied improved techniques
MCC Total		51,925,328	87.3%	698,425,169	90.2%	6,908	275,094	4,217	121,795	1,192	86,151,395	126,210	34,947	1,004
EAPLA Total		10,686,574	93.0%	190,892,731	88.1%	2,975	83,699	1,591	1,682	1,096	65,491,633	56,114	–	406
AFRICA Total		41,238,754	85.8%	507,532,438	90.9%	3,933	191,395	2,626	120,113	96	20,659,762	70,096	34,947	598
Armenia	EAPLA	4,601,073	100.0%	106,653,443	100.0%	2,389	45,639	227	–	1,008	13,133,200	26,424	–	178
El Salvador		–	–	–	–	–	15,363	281	–	29	4,598,748	11,520	–	163
Georgia		1,155,881	53.4%	–	–	–	–	291	–	–	19,880,003	–	–	–
Honduras		–	–	–	–	–	7,265	464	400	–	17,100,000	6,996	–	–
Indonesia		–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Moldova		4,929,620	95.7%	84,239,288	73.0%	586	6,328	328	1,282	59	10,779,682	2,070	–	65
Nicaragua		–	–	–	–	–	9,104	–	–	–	–	9,104	–	–
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	17,268,474	74.8%	74,339,448	95.3%	2,414	12,307	278	2,240	96	2,802,000	8,237	3,369	28
Cabo Verde I		–	–	5,167,848	97.6%	–	553	–	13	–	617,000	106	–	–
Ghana		5,202,887	100.0%	13,009,963	100.0%	–	66,930	1,724	514	–	16,740,762	59,060	–	535
Madagascar		–	–	–	–	–	31,366	324	–	–	–	1,892	–	1
Mali		9,077,220	98.2%	148,951,503	98.3%	–	1,308	–	97,503	–	500,000	801	–	–
Morocco		–	–	111,353,027	99.0%	–	40,863	114	19,393	–	–	–	31,578	34
Mozambique		–	–	–	–	–	28,830	186	–	–	–	–	–	–
Namibia		–	–	–	–	–	9,238	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Senegal		9,690,173	86.3%	154,710,649	75.0%	1,519	–	–	450	–	–	–	–	–
Gender*
Female						227	50,314	106		121	924,102	17,497		19
Male						4,292	118,666	408		1,063	12,657,580	39,858		74

All program data are as of September 10, 2015. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment.† All financial data is of June 10, 2015. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.
*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier Compacts.

Common Indicator Definitions:

(AI-1) Value of signed irrigation feasibility and design contracts:
The value of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for agricultural irrigation investments using 609(g) and compact funds.
(AI-2) Percent disbursed of irrigation feasibility and design contracts:
The total amount of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for agricultural irrigation investments disbursed divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(AI-3) Value of signed irrigation construction contracts:
The value of all signed construction contracts for agricultural irrigation investments using compact funds.
(AI-4) Percent disbursed of irrigation construction contracts:
The total amount of all signed construction contracts for agricultural irrigation investments disbursed divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(AI-5) Temporary employment generated in irrigation:
The number of people temporarily employed or contracted by MCA-contracted construction companies to work on construction of irrigation systems.
(AI-6) Farmers trained:
The number of primary sector producers (farmers, ranchers, fishermen, and other primary sector producers) receiving technical assistance or participating in a training session (on improved production techniques and technologies, including post-harvest interventions, developing business, financial, or marketing planning, accessing credit or finance, or accessing input and output markets).
(AI-7) Enterprises assisted:
The number of enterprises; producer, processing, and marketing organizations; water users associations; trade and business associations; and community-based organizations receiving assistance.
(AI-8) Hectares under improved irrigation:
The number of hectares served by existing or new irrigation infrastructure that are either rehabilitated or constructed with MCC funding.
(AI-9) Loan borrowers:
The number of borrowers (primary sector producers, rural entrepreneurs, and associations) who access loans for on-farm, off-farm, and rural investment through MCC financial assistance.
(AI-10) Value of agricultural and rural loans:
The value of agricultural loans and rural loans disbursed for on-farm, off-farm, and rural investments.
(AI-11) Farmers who have applied improved practices as a result of training:
The number of primary sector producers (farmers, ranchers, fishermen, and other primary sector producers) that are applying new production or managerial techniques introduced or supported by MCC training or technical assistance, such as input use, production techniques, irrigation practices, post- harvest treatment, farm management techniques, or marketing strategies.
(AI-12) Hectares under improved practices as a result of training:
The number of hectares on which farmers are applying new production or managerial techniques introduced or supported by MCC, such as input use, production techniques, irrigation practices, post-harvest treatment, farm management techniques, or marketing strategies.
(AI-13) Enterprises that have applied improved techniques:
The number of rural enterprises; producer, processing, and marketing organizations; water users associations; trade and business associations; and community-based organizations that are applying managerial or processing techniques introduced or supported by MCC.

Education Common Indicators:

		Process Indicators		Output Indicators			Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(E-1) Value of signed educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts (USD)	(E-2) Percent disbursed of educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts	(E-3) Legal, financial, and policy reforms adopted	(E-4) Educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated	(E-5) Instructors trained	(E-6) Students participating in MCC-supported education activities	(E-7) Graduates from MCC-supported education activities	(E-8) Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities
MCC Total		180,344,006	98.6%	5	746	4,407	215,242	62,211	–
EAPLA Total		38,036,913	98.1%	5	40	1,798	48,234	16,252	–
AFRICA Total		142,307,093	98.7%	–	706	2,609	167,008	45,959	–
El Salvador	EAPLA	9,857,585	99.8%	–	22	378	30,672	4,285	–
Georgia II		–	–	–	–	50	82	–	–
Mongolia		28,179,328	97.6%	5	18	1,370	17,480	11,967	–
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	22,758,211	99.9%	–	396	557	31,065	4,035	–
Ghana		18,689,747	100.0%	–	250	–	41,019	–	–
Morocco		4,568,837	76.2%	–	–	2,052	93,424	41,383	–
Namibia		96,290,298	99.2%	–	60	–	1,500	541	–
Gender*
Female						2,297	72,843	36,990	–
Male						2,110	64,223	20,513	–

All program data are as of September 10, 2015. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment.† Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts. Indicators in this Results Framework may be added, removed , or modified as MCC’s investments in education evolve over time. ‡ All MCC education programs have as their long-term end goal an increase in individual or household income and a corresponding decrease in poverty. † All financial data is of June 10, 2015.

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier compacts.

Common Indicator Definitions:

(E-1) Value of signed educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts:: The value of all signed construction contracts for educational facility construction, rehabilitation, or equipping (e.g. information technology, desks and chairs, electricity and lighting, water systems, latrines) using compact funds.
(E-2) Percent disbursed of educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts:: The total amount of all signed construction contracts for education facility works or equipping divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(E-3) Legal, financial, and policy reforms adopted:: The number of reforms adopted by the public sector attributable to compact support that increase the education sector's capacity to improve access, quality, and/or relevance of education at any level, from primary to post-secondary.
(E-4) Educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated:: The number of educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated according to standards stipulated in MCA contracts signed with implementers.
(E-5) Instructors trained:: The number of classroom instructors who complete MCC-supported training focused on instructional quality as defined by the compact training activity.
(E-6) Students participating in MCC-supported education activities:: The number of students enrolled or participating in MCC-supported educational schooling programs.
(E-7) Graduates from MCC-supported education activities:: The number of students graduating from the highest grade (year) for that educational level in MCC-supported education schooling programs.
(E-8) Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities:: The number of MCC-supported training program graduates employed in their field of study within one year after graduation.

Land Common Indicators:

		Output Indicators						Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	R(L-1) Legal and regulatory reforms adopted	R(L-2) Land administration offices established or upgraded	R(L-3) Stakeholders trained	R(L-4) Conflicts successfully mediated	R(L-5) Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system	R(L-6) Land rights formalized	R(L-7) Percentage change in time for property transactions	R(L-8) Percentage change in cost for property transactions
MCC Total		115	393	73,211	12,255	315,480	311,785	NA	NA
EAPLA Total		6	15	3,920	10,639	18,336	20,672	NA	NA
AFRICA Total		109	378	69,291	1,616	297,144	291,113	NA	NA
Mongolia	EAPLA	6	15	3,920	10,639	18,336	20,672	–	–
Nicaragua	EAPLA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Benin	AFRICA	–	–	50	–	–	–	–	–
Burkina Faso		54	78	61,057	1,364	18,490	4,793	–	–
Cabo Verde II		17	23	148	–	–	–	–	–
Ghana		4	3	427	23	1,481	–	–	–
Lesotho		11	1	575	151	53,296	21,753	-93	–
Madagascar		4	237	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mali		–	1	1,354	–	–	–	–	–
Mozambique		–	26	1,516	–	205,005	251,556	–	–
Namibia		19	–	2,524	–	8,869	4,356	–	–
Senegal		–	9	1,640	78	10,003	8,655	–	–
Gender*
Male				51,326			83,967
Female				20,729			54,026
Joint							18,489
Location*
Urban						177,420	146,969
Rural						84,764	122,391

*Gender and location totals may not match overall totals due to lack of counting by gender and location in earlier Compacts.

Common Indicator Definitions:

(L-1) Legal and regulatory reforms adopted:: The number of specific pieces of legislation or implementing regulations adopted by the compact country and attributable to compact support.
(L-2) Land administration offices established or upgraded:: The number of land administration and service offices or other related facilities that the project physically establishes or upgrades.
(L-3) Stakeholders trained:: The number of public officials, traditional authorities, project beneficiaries and representatives of the private sector, receiving formal on-the-job land training or technical assistance regarding registration, surveying, conflict resolution, land allocation, land use planning, land legislation, land management or new technologies.
(L-4) Conflicts successfully mediated:: The number of disputed land and property rights cases that have been resolved by local authorities, contractors, mediators or courts with compact support.
(L-5) Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system:: The number of parcels with relevant parcel information corrected or newly incorporated into an official land information system (whether a system for the property registry, cadastre or an integrated system).
(L-6) Land rights formalized:: The number of household, commercial and other legal entities (e.g., NGOs, churches, hospitals) receiving formal recognition of ownership and/or use rights through certificates, titles, leases, or other recorded documentation by government institutions or traditional authorities at national or local levels.
(L-7) Percentage change in time for property transactions:: The average percentage change in number of days for an individual or company to conduct a property transaction within the formal system.
(L-8) Percentage change in cost for property transactions:: The average percentage change in US Dollars of out of pocket cost for an individual or company to conduct a property transaction within the formal system.

Roads Common Indicators:

	Process Indicators								Output Indicators	Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(R-1) Value of signed road feasibility and design contracts	(R-2) Percent disbursed of road feasibility and design contracts	(R-3) Kilometers of roads under design	(R-4) Value of signed road construction contracts	(R-5) Percent disbursed of road construction contracts	(R-6) Kilometers of roads under works contracts	(R-7) Temporary employment generated in road construction	(R-8) Kilometers of roads completed	(R-9) Roughness	(R-10) Average annual daily traffic	(R-11) Road traffic fatalities
MCC Total		130,499,160	96.7%	4,433	2,370,736,222	86.1%	3,918	49,822	2,876	NA	NA	350
EAPLA Total		64,075,771	93%	1,758	1,109,432,912	85%	1834.3	1,309	1,590	–	–	–
AFRICA Total		66,423,389	100%	2,675	1,261,303,310	87%	2083.4	48,513	1,286	–	–	350
Armenia	EAPLA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	24.4	3.47	735	–
El Salvador		18,321,410	99%	223	248,378,825	97%	223.0	–	223.32	–	–	–
Georgia		11,980,000	99%	–	197,299,030	100%	220.2	–	220.20	1.50	1,092	–
Honduras		9,500,000	75%	673	179,400,000	72%	673.0	–	610.10	–	–	–
Moldova		–	–	96	100,807,443	96%	96.0	1,309	96	–	–
Mongolia		6,083,650	89%	19.3	73,108,907	91%	176.4	–	176.40	1.90	353	–
Nicaragua		–	–	375.5	56,507,526	100%	74.0	–	74.0	–	–	–
Philippines		15,235,623	94%	222	197,934,131	49%	222.0	–	16	–	–	–
Vanuatu		2,955,088	100%	150	55,997,051	97%	149.7	–	149.70	3.00	–	–
Burkina Faso	AFRICA	8,339,651	115%	536	140,205,145	102%	419.1	4,162	277.80	–	–	6
Cape Verde I		3,520,000	92%	63	24,280,000	100%	40.6	–	40.60	2.00		–
Ghana		5,549,044	100%	943	250,604,022	100%	446.4	35,455	445.03		–	301
Mali		–	–	–	42,918,038	35%	81.0	–	79.00	–	–	–
Mozambique**		17,669,992	85%	253	132,240,557	88%	253.0	2,308	253		–	–
Senegal		12,201,371	102%	406	271,128,882	70%	375.0	2,757	–	–	–	43
Tanzania		19,143,331	107%	473	399,926,666	91%	468.34	3,831	190.14	–	–	–
Gender*
Male								13,260				45
Female								1,197				4
Road Type*
Primary		65,222,944	23%	2,060	1,342,644,867	90%	1,867		1,177.58
Secondary		24,735,623	87%	1,374	642,006,924	75%	1,133		319.68
Tertiary		6,719,183	112%	935	164,505,401	66%	681		1,077.77

*Gender and road type totals may not match overall totals due to lack of counting by gender and road type in earlier Compacts.

** The kilometers of roads completed for Mozambique is provisional data. Subject to change after verification of takeover certificates.

Common Indicator Definitions:

(R-1) Value of signed road feasibility and design contracts:: The value of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for road investments using 609(g) and compact funds.
(R-2.1) Value disbursed of road reasibilty and design contracts:: The value disbursed of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for road investments using 609(g) and compact funds.
(R-3) Kilometers of roads under design:: The length of roads in kilometers under design contracts. This includes designs for building new roads and reconstructing, rehabilitating, resurfacing or upgrading existing roads.
(R-4) Value of signed road construction contracts:: The value of all signed construction contracts for new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads using compact funds.
(R-5.1) Value disbursed of roads construction contracts:: The value disbursed of all signed construction contracts for new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads.
(R-5) Percent disbursed of road construction contracts:: The total amount of all signed construction contracts for new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads disbursed divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(R-6) Kilometers of roads under works contracts:: The length of roads in kilometers under works contracts for construction of new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads.
(R-7) Temporary employment generated in road construction:: The number of people temporarily employed or contracted by MCA-contracted construction companies to work on construction of new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads.
(R-8) Kilometers of roads completed:: The length of roads in kilometers on which construction of new roads or reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing or upgrading of existing roads is complete (certificates handed over and approved).
(R-9) Roughness:: The measure of the roughness of the road surface, in meters of height per kilometer of distance traveled.
(R-10) Average annual daily traffic:: The average number and type of vehicles per day, averaged over different times (day and night) and over different seasons to arrive at an annualized daily average.
(R-11) Road traffic fatalities:: The number of road traffic fatalities per year on roads constructed, rehabilitated or improved with MCC funding.

Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Common Indicators:

		Process Indicators					Output Indicators		Outcome Indicators
Country	Region	(WS-1) Value of signed water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts (USD)	(WS-2) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts	(WS-3) Value of signed water and sanitation construction contracts (USD)	(WS-4) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation construction contracts	(WS-5) Temporary employment generated in water and sanitation construction	(WS-6) People trained in hygiene and sanitary best practices	(WS-7) Water points constructed	(WS-8) Non revenue water	(WS-9) Continuity of service	(WS-10) Operating cost coverage	(WS-11) Volume of water produced**	(WS-12) Access to improved water supply	(WS-13) Access to improved sanitation	(WS-14) Residential water consumption**	(WS-15) Industrial/Commercial water consumption**	(WS-16) Incidence of diarrhea**
MCC Total		55,146,795	97.7%	694,655,717	69.7%	15,437	12,038	1,181	49.2%	NA	NA	200,330,000	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
EAPLA Total		5,250,665	96.2%	368,186,587	62.8%	931	2,406	–	60.6%	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
AFRICA Total		49,896,130	97.9%	326,469,130	77.5%	14,506	9,632	1,181	37.9%	–	–	200,330,000	–	–	–	–	–
El Salvador	EAPLA	4,983,800	96.0%	10,451,448	97.5%	–	2,406	–	–	–	–	–	83%	88%
Georgia		266,865	100.0%	54,315,000	94.2%	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Jordan		–	–	303,420,139	56.0%	931	–	–	60.6%	36	83%	–	–	72%	–	–	–
Cabo Verde II	AFRICA	2,889,560	69.9%	2,343,526	26.4%	316	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	20	23,896.8	–
Ghana		1,475,148	100.0%	13,949,465	100.0%	–	778	392	–	–	–	–	–	–	36	–	–
Lesotho		3,594,133	100.0%	59,733,645	89%	11,527	454	175	27.0%	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Mozambique		35,076,009	99.1%	169,500,497	87.5%	2,276	8,400	614	–	–	–	–	23.4	–	19.5	–	–
Tanzania		6,861,280	102.1%	45,403,796	81.1%	387	–	–	48.8%	–	113%	200,330,000	–	–	167	998,440	–
Zambia		–	–	35,538,201	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Gender*
Female						460	5,719
Male						3,063	5,865

“All program data are as of September 10, 2015. Data are preliminary and subject to adjustment.† All financial data is of June 10, 2015. Grey shading indicates closed-out Compacts; data revision is not expected for these Compacts.

** This is a monitoring indicator; any change over baseline data represents the current trend and does not represent the direct impact of the MCC‐investment.”

*Gender totals may not match overall totals due to lack of gender counting in earlier compacts.

Common Indicator Definitions:

(WS-1) Value of signed water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts:: The value of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for water and sanitation investments using 609(g) and compact funds.
(WS-2) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation feasibility and design contracts:: The total amount of all signed feasibility, design, and environmental contracts, including resettlement action plans, for water and sanitation investments disbursed divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(WS-3) Value of signed water and sanitation construction contracts:: The value of all signed construction contracts for reconstruction, rehabilitation, or upgrading of water and sanitation works using compact funds.
(WS-4) Percent disbursed of water and sanitation construction contracts:: The total amount of all signed construction contracts for construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or upgrading of water and sanitation works disbursed divided by the total value of all signed contracts.
(WS-5) Temporary employment generated in water and sanitation construction:: The number of people temporarily employed or contracted by MCA-contracted construction companies to work on construction of water or sanitation systems.
(WS-6) People trained in hygiene and sanitary best practices:: The number of people who have completed training on hygiene and sanitary practices that block the fecal-oral transmission route.
(WS-7) Water points constructed:: The number of non-networked, stand-alone water supply systems constructed, such as: protected dug wells, tube-wells / boreholes, protected natural springs and rainwater harvesting / catchment systems.
(WS-8) Non revenue water:: The difference between water supplied and water sold (i.e. volume of water “lost”) expressed as a percentage of water supplied.
(WS-9) Continuity of service:: Average hours of service per day for water supply.
(WS-10) Operating cost coverage:: Total annual operational revenues divided by total annual operating costs.
(WS-11) Volume of water produced:: Total volume of water produced in cubic meters per day for the service area, i.e. leaving treatment works operated by the utility and purchased treated water, if any.
(WS-12) Access to improved water supply:: The percentage of households in the MCC project area whose main source of drinking water is a private piped connection (into dwelling or yard), public tap/standpipe, tube-well, protected dug well, protected spring or rainwater.
(WS-13) Access to improved sanitation:: The percentage of households in the MCC project area who get access to and use an improved sanitation facility such as flush toilet to a piped sewer system, flush toilet to a septic tank, flush or pour flush toilet to a pit, composting toilet, ventilated improved pit latrine or pit latrine with slab and cover.
(WS-14) Residential water consumption:: The average water consumption in liters per person per day.
(WS-15) Industrial/Commercial water consumption:: The average amount of commercial water consumed measured in cubic meters per month.
(WS-16) Incidence of diarrhea:: The percentage of individuals reported as having diarrhea in the two weeks preceding the survey.

FY 2016 Corporate Goals

These goals are intended to provide clarity and prioritization for management and staff as the agency moves into FY 2016. As in past years, the corporate goals are the starting point for annual department and division goal-setting, from which staff develop their individual performance plans.

Empower staff to better fulfill the agency mission and improve organizational health and staff morale.
Continue to deliver high quality MCC investments and partnerships.
Strengthen analytical tools and continue to lead on measurement and reporting results.
Strengthen operational efficiency and effectiveness by improving knowledge management, business processes and systems.
Expand and deepen the MCC model for greater impact and to enable the agency to continue to fulfill its mission.